Résultats de recherche
27 oct. 2015 · The proposition is sometimes given as dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum. This fuller form was penned by the eloquent French literary critic, Antoine Léonard Thomas, in an award-winning 1765 essay in praise of Descartes, where it appeared as "Puisque je doute, je pense; puisque je pense, j'existe." In English, this is "Since I doubt, I think; since I think I exist"; with rearrangement and ...
15 janv. 2024 · So far, I understand that there has been multiple interpretations and critiques of the statement and I know so far that the statement "Cogito, ergo sum" in a more elaborate way could be written "Dubito, ergo; cogito, ergo sum" which translates to English as "I doubt therefore I think therefore I am" but I have understood in multiple occasions ...
One counter argument to the Descarte's Cogito Ergo Sum is the idea that you do not need to be a thinker to have a thought. This was inconceivable in the 1700s, and is still not wholly convincing now. It rests on the idea that something that is not conscious can exist. Share. Improve this answer.
I fundamentally agree with @Christopher - the cogito argument is an argument, but not an inference. There is no inference of the form : "if p, then q". On all the complex issue, it is worth reading in SEP the entry on Descartes' Epistemology and in The Cambridge Companion to Descartes , ed.John Cottingham (1992), at least : Louis Loeb, “The Cartesian Circle” and Peter Markie, “The Cogito ...
'Cogito ergo sum', 'I am thinking, therefore I am' or 'I think therefore I must be' is an existence conditioned on thought. Once thought stops, you don't exist. Other than demonstrating that experience is dependent, conditional, subject to a frame of reference, the statement says no thing interesting.
14 nov. 2019 · The Latin translation of the Discourse says, 'Ego cogito, ergo sum, sive existo', while the Latin in the Meditations is, 'Ego cogito, ergo sum'. In both Latin formulas, there is an emphasis , which fits Descartes own exposition, on the I, the dramatic implication being that this is an argument to be used by the very person who has been trying, unsuccessfully, to doubt his own existence.
8 févr. 2021 · 3. Descartes later clarified that cogito ergo sum was not meant as an argument, but rather a direct existence claim that he "could not bring himself" to doubt. The extra "power", if any, comes from self-referential nature of it: even if you are doubting that you are thinking you are still thinking to do the doubting.
24 août 2019 · 4. Following Descartes but in the opposite direction: I exist. Something has made the assertion in the previous sentence and must have thought it to do so. Therefore my thoughts exist. Combining with the direction established by Descartes I have cogito ⇔ sum. Since assuming either is equiavlent to assuming the other I conclude that Descartes ...
We can be pretty certain of tautologies, which are axioms of logic based on the principle of non-contradiction. After all, 'cogito ergo sum' already presupposes that something must exist in order to think, and presupposes a notion of 'ergo', both of which are (to Descartes at least) at least as certain as the full phrase itself.
26 nov. 2021 · Cogito itself is easy to formalize: I think → I am (major premise); I think (minor premise) ⊨ I am (conclusion). What you are looking for, I am guessing, is formalizing Descartes's argument for the minor premise ("we cannot doubt of our existence while we doubt"). Something like: ¬X → I doubt X, doubting → thinking ⊨ I think.
