Résultats de recherche
7 juin 2021 · 2. 'to' is directed towards only one person, whereas, 'with' includes both people. Example: John was talking to Smith. John was speaking with Smith. In the first sentence, only John is speaking. In the second sentence, a conversation of two people is implied. Share.
22 août 2005 · Here's my take on what it is: 'Belong to' describes ownership: the blue 1963 Ford Thunderbird belongs to me, the rusty 1989 Dodge belongs to you. It's the traditional sense of 'belong'. 'Belong with' describes similarity and where something should be categorised: in a library Dickens belongs with Hardy and Austen.
16 juin 2020 · In terms of English language usage, "of" means the things that make up the set, while "with" means things that are contained within the set. "Of" is the entire set, while "with" may be part of the set. For instance, let's say that I have a basket containing puppies. If I describe it as "a basket of puppies", you could infer that the only thing ...
16 juin 2020 · From VOA Special English: Germany is facing a crisis as low birth rates combine with a growing population of citizens who are living longer. The word "combine" somehow confused me. In my view, we can use the expression "combine with" in the following forms: <somebody> combine <something> with <something>. <something> is combined with <something>.
9 janv. 2018 · 4. Where the cause of disappointment is a person, we normally use in. Where the cause is a physical thing or an action/event, we're more likely to use by or with. Thus, for OP's first example context, "I was disappointed by my result" is the most common form. There's nothing wrong with with there, but in is unlikely.
14 mars 2017 · Adverbials of manner tell you how or in what way something is done. However, as Davo notes, they carry different shades of meaning. "With" is more neutral than "in", as with would be more likely to be used if there is no surprise, and in makes it seem more remarkable. You can also indicate that you consider it remarkable by adding the word ...
Yes, the title is correctly expressing my question, so which one of these : What do you mean with that? What do you mean by that? Question : i've been wondering which one of them that sounds more
16 nov. 2007 · madrid73 said: Hi, what the correct way to say it: 1.- ... related to the present document. 2.- ... related with the present document. thanks. --. please correct all my mistakes. It would be the first one, related to I cannot think of any context in English were related to would work. Hope this helps.
29 juil. 2007 · Jul 26, 2017. #8. Reece, I'm afraid that your logic is faulty. "I am not opposed with something" to mean "I agree with something" is nonsensical in English. Similarly, negating contradiction does not change the preposition. "That is contradictory to common sense" and "That is not contradictory to common sense" are the correct forms.
10 mars 2013 · Oct 9, 2013. #6. Hello Learnathon. I'd say that "if I updated you on my schedule" would mean "if I gave you the latest information on my schedule", whereas "if I updated you with my schedule" would mean "if I gave you the latest information on what I'm doing by giving you my [current] schedule". Of the two, I would expect "on" rather than "with".
