Résultats de recherche
11 sept. 2019 · Others have proven much harder for the authorities to shake off. Here we present some of the more persistent conspiracy theories surrounding the events of that fateful day, as well as the most plausible explanations put forward by experts, official reports and eyewitnesses.
- Did Popular Mechanics Really Have An Open Mind Regarding The Evidence?
- How Did You Pick The Questions to Investigate?
- So How Did You Determine Whom to interview? What Was The Reporting Process like?
- Why Won't You Come "Debate" The Conspiracy Theorists?
Yes. Conspiracy theorists make a large number of claims that would have very troubling implications, if true. Our mission was to research those claims. If we found even a grain of truth behind any of them, it would have been a major story, which we wouldn't have hesitated to publish. On the other hand, if the claims turned out to be based on falseh...
Sooner or later, every conspiracy theory comes down to some factual claim that, if true, would be at odds with the conventional account of September 11. For example, the claim that "jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel" is used to suggest that the fires that followed weren't hot enough to cause the subsequent collapses. After all, if fire...
We went straight to the sources--hundreds of them. Wherever the picture remained incomplete, we spoke with the people who could best respond to the rumors and fill in the gaps. How do we know it was aircraft wreckage found outside the Twin Towers on September 11, instead of some drone or missile? We spoke to the photographers and investigators who ...
We have. (Click herefor video.) Generally, however, we have declined invitations to "debate" the events of September 11 with conspiracy theorists. We have done so for two reasons: First, we think the notion of a debate misses the point. This magazine has no political stance on the levels of pilot certification achieved by the hijackers before Septe...
Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts is a non-fiction book published by Hearst Communications, Inc. on August 15, 2006. The book is based on the article " 9/11: Debunking the Myths " in the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics [1] and is written by David Dunbar and Brad Reagan, responding to various 9/11 ...
- David Dunbar, Brad Reagan
- August 15, 2006
- 2006
- Hearst Communications, Inc.
11 sept. 2023 · Special Report: Debunking the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories of the World Trade Center. Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy...
- Hearst
4 août 2011 · Debunking 9/11 Myths: An Excerpt from the new book based on Popular Mechanics March 2005 cover story.
17 déc. 2022 · The magazine consulted more than 300 experts in fields like air traffic control, aviation, civil engineering, fire fighting, and metallurgy, and then rigorously, meticulously, and scientifically analyzed the 25 most persistent 9/11 conspiracy theories.
9 sept. 2021 · The 9/11 Commission’s final report took them on in 2004, and a year later, the magazine Popular Mechanics published a special issue debunking them. The theories drew interest from Hollywood ...
