Résultats de recherche
Reason. One "textbook" (possibly outdated) rule is never to break up an infinitive (or to never break up an infinitive). However, at least in modern American English, this rule is followed or not followed as if there wasn't any such rule at all. In other words, whether to use "not to do" and "to not do" seems to come down to personal preference ...
25 août 2016 · 0. "Have you" when the word 'have' expresses a helping verb, (for example: I have made it.) we can make it question just by replacing 'have' before the subject (Have I made it?). And whole the rest sentence will remain same. In the sentence "I have made it" , 'made' is the main verb where 'have' is just helping it.
21 févr. 2014 · Both you and your informant are correct in different circumstances. The difference lies in the character of the verb involved. With a telic verb—one which includes an end, a specific goal or point of completion—there is a marked difference between the simple form and the progressive form: the progressive form marks the action as incomplete ...
29 oct. 2014 · 21. The rule is that Do support is called into play after a Wh- interrogative when subject/auxiliary inversion is called for and the verb is not headed by BE or an auxiliary. Consequently: You do not use do after a Wh-. a) when the Wh- word is the Subject of the verb, or is a 'determiner' on the subject—subject/auxiliary inversion does not ...
Because even though the entity that is allowed to do something (i.e. an object pronoun) isn't included in the sentence, the thing that is allowed is still to be done by an entity. 3: allow + pronoun + to + infinitive: It allows me to do something. This is grammatically correct, and probably the most commonly used form.
1) Do you know what is it? 2) Do you know what it is? I kinda do a Google research on this and basically most people say it should be the first one but unfortunately the correct one is the second one. Why it is so? If we refer to the rule of making question (WH-word + verb to be/verb to have + subject + verb + description). But based on the ...
7 oct. 2016 · He started running because his doctor said it was good for his heart. In the first sentence "started running" is the verb, while in the second "started" is the verb and "running" acts as the direct object of the verb. However, if you substitute "to run" for "running" in both sentences, it doesn't change the meaning in any significant way.
For Primary auxiliaries (be/have/do), and Modal auxiliaries (will, would, can, could, may, might, shall, should, must, ought to, used to): Simply reverse the statement to form the question. For all others use ‘do’ to form questions: Place the verb before the subject.
21 oct. 2021 · Normally we do not say we are doing an action. Each of those words, do and act, implies the other. If you do something you have acted. If you have acted you have done something. In some situations, such as your second sentence which is a very nice example, we do want to refer to doing an action but we only need to
16 juin 2015 · This means you will study and when you do, you will study these things. I have some things for studying. This implies that you will study these things, but it could also mean these things help you when studying other things. The difference becomes more apparent when going from talking about current or future events to talking about past events.
